I am drawing still, no seriously I am!

I will be posting some more drawings soon enough. I just need to scan them. However I have been reading some of the books I bought some time ago. One in particular that is quite literally a course on its own is Walt Stanchfields book: Drawn to Life: 20 Golden Years of Disney Master Classes Volume 1

Drawn to Life is a pretty good book, and I have been drawing along side it as well. I don't believe this is a book you can hand to the beginning artist. If anything Preston Blairs book is the beginners book, not to say it is only good for beginners. That isn't true either. However, Drawn to Life goes into quite a lot of depth, has lots of terms and isn't necessarily a step 1 to step 2 kind of book. It expects that you have some basic understanding already, which is perfectly fine really.

I also went back to Eric Goldberg's Character Animation Crash Course. It is literally a crash course! You have roughly 40 pages (back to back) of drawing lessons that help reinforce what you can learn in Preston Blair's book. The rest is animation 101, and then you should have some drawing skill under you belt before you proceed. Eric Goldberg's book is nice and all, but it doesn't quite compare to Preston Blair's. It complements it at best. Although for me it was the book I saw before running into Preston's.

I also receive my Tex Avery DVD collection. I must say that I am content with the quality offered. It isn't quite as refined as the Droopy Collection, but it is still better (IMO) than torrent downloads of the same cartoons. When I say better I don't mean that the torrent download is terrible. What I mean to say is that you will find the quality to have a better consistency over all. Some of the cartoons I wanted to see in better quality were cartoons like: Bad Luck Blackie, and Dixieland Droopy. One thing to note with Bambers version of the collection is that they are meant for television. Essentially these people have licenses to sell these cartoons to television networks in the UK (if I am not mistaken). However most networks will usually censor or edit these cartoons. This will largely depend on the cartoon though.

So should you buy the Bambers collection? I would say yes at this point. Until an official Tex Avery release is made where the cartoons are cleaned up (as seen in the Droopy Collection) you will have one of three options: a)torrent the cartoon collection, b)purchase the collection from Bambers, or c)get the LaserDisc version (assuming you have a LaserDisc player).

A couple of things I want to talk about.

So, no artwork today. That doesn't mean I haven't been drawing though! I am not slacking off (much) that I can guarantee. Still sketching/doodling at the office, and recently went back to the animation disk I got from Chuck's. I have been drawing Tex Avery characters. Speaking of Tex, I went to a site called bambers from a post done by an Archie. He posted this find on JohnK's blog. My order of the DVD collection is currently on route to me from the UK. I have high hopes that the quality will be higher than the torrents. Or at the very least pulled from the Laser Disc, I heard that Tex Avery collection had great image quality.

One thing I don't see a whole lot is animation captures. There are a fair amount of blogs that do this, but most don't capture much of the shorts. I would like to see a blog that has every theatrical cartoon with a high quality capture. Going through all of the key frames, showing all the wild antics and gags. Capturing various expressions and moment in the cartoon. For now I will find what I can, and capture what I can.

Something I will have to work towards is getting a proper scanner for artwork. I still am not happy with the results from the previous post. However I will live with it just the same. The only issue I had was the sketchbook bind being pushed by the scanner cover.

I am also thinking of getting a tumblr account and link those posts here as need be. I personally hate how rigid the image posting system is for blogger. If there was one thing I'd change it'd be that.

Anyhow, back to work.

EDIT: While I do indeed still want to see more captures of theatrical cartoons, I will take back what I said in regards to a lack of them. I apologize for my seemingly lazy attitude on finding these captures.

Sketchbook sketches/studies

So I have finally got some of the sketches ready for posting. Not much to say on them really. Just some more drawings based off of cartoons, photos of people, animals, and Ronald Searle. That was the one thing I had forgotten to mention in my previous post on influences. I had forgotten to mention Ronald Searle, whom I drew from for studies based on the book "Modern Types."

The book is written by Geoffrey Gorer, and it goes into quite a lot detail on various types of people. Ronald Searle's inkings of these characters is a good compliment to the writing.

One thing to note, I did have trouble scanning the sketchbook. I didn't want to take any of the pages out, so I did what I could. Also, I scanned a lot more than this. I just won't be posting those sketches/studies any time soon.

The sketches/studies below range from oldest to newest.

Influences in my life, artistically.

I have scanned some of my sketchbook work and do intend to post it soon. Before that I want to post something as a mental note to myself, as I am certain no one will read this. So I was stumbling around on John Kricfalusi's blog, when I came upon his talk on influences. The links are below.

http://johnkstuff.blogspot.com/2006/09/importance-of-having-lot-of-influences.html

http://johnkstuff.blogspot.com/2006/09/influences-wont-help-you-without-skill.html

Now I have nothing to counter, or other wise add to the discussion. However, after reading these two posts I decided to look at my influences through out my life. How expansive is it? Am I really influenced by them, or am I merely copying them with the notion of being influenced?

One thing to note, I didn't grow up with the desire to animate at all. It wasn't a life long goal/ambition until I was about 15/16. Before hand I merely drew. I had wanted to recreate epic and dynamic battles from ancient and medieval past. Showing the chaos and intensity of war, while glorifying it as well. Very childish in retrospect, but I was just drawing to create exciting imagery. This was influenced mostly from the real-time strategy video game series Age of Empires. Heck, I was also influenced by the books I read on the subjects of warfare. I would see the pictures of Knights commanding their soldiers, and doing battle with other Knights and such. It was a lot of fun, and I would get lost in it.

The only problem is that I didn't have anyone to teach me. I ended up doodling in pages, drawing people who were 5 heads tall fighting, or stick figures on oddly shaped pieces of land. I don't have any of those drawings at this point. They have long since then been thrown away.

I only ever had one teacher up until high school who I looked up to for knowledge. That was my older brother, who in some ways I have surpassed (if by a little). His understanding of drawing principles was also in a sense non-existent, all he really had was some basic understanding of anatomy. He tried to teach me what he could, and I tried to keep in mind what he said. He introduced to me (when I was 13/14) an artist by the name of Burne Hogarth.

Now, Burne Hogarth was at that time (in my life) one of the greatest artists I could imagine. His artwork felt very 3-Dimensional to me, very dynamic, and very energetic. At this point he seems like a more stylized version of George Bridgman. Not to say Hogarth isn't a talented artist, as he is. My only issue is that his work never seemed practical or have much life to it. He could draw the figure in any angle with proper perspective. That is impressive. As good as he is, it was too early of an influence to start off on. With no drawing skills to be had I ended up trying to copy someone who was far too stylized and complex.

I did this for some time, and sort of expected high school art classes to help teach me drawing fundamentals. Let me say this, don't expect your high school to teach you anything in the ways of drawing. You have to do that yourself, and hope they can point you in the right direction. Not to say I blame my high school for my failing, as they really aren't to blame. When you have about 20-30 kids (most of which take the course to relax and get an "easy credit") you don't have much motivation to teach much outside of the curriculum.

I will give my art teacher two big thumbs up for one thing though. It was his relation to a childhood friend that helped point me in the right direction. For that I can never be more grateful. Plus his classes allowed me to experiment with paints, and inks. To say I am embarrassed for my idiocy during his lessons would be putting any retrospect on it lightly. I really wish I had been more focused on drawing principles. The lack of common sense at that time was staggering, and would come to light when I interned at Chuck's studio. I still kick myself for not studying cartoons when I had the chance. I knew nothing when I entered the studio, and walked out with more direction and study material than you can shake a stick at.

Anyways, I am ranting and being a little too personal. Again, I doubt anyone will read this. However lets get back to the point I am trying to make.

My first influences (prior to internship) were simply: video games, Burne Hogarth, books on warfare (ancient to modern), anime (how embarrassing), random deviant artists (some of them I still look at with admiration), and my older brother. That is a very poor influence base to work from, and certainly explains why my work never really progressed at this point. Plus to say I was influenced is incorrect, I was again merely copying from these "influences" of mine. I have also done this with my work post-internship at the studio.

During my time at the studio I picked up "influences": Nine old men (in particular Milt Khal, Marc Davis, Freddie Moore), Tex Avery, Frank Frazetta, Alex Toth, JC Leyendecker, Norman Rockwell, Preston Blair, Warner Brothers (in general), Art Babbitt, Grim Natwick, Richard Williams, Ralph Bakshi, and the artists at the Chucks studio (Chuck himself included).

Again I want to reiterate, I was merely in amazement at the talent my eyes had beheld. I had never been exposed to this much artistic work before. What I saw online through sites like Deviantart, and Sheezyart (while great talent is found on these sites) never compared to the exposure I had at the studio. I even found my self improving dramatically when I did studies there, as if a switch was turned on for the first time. I ended up treating the studio as my personal art school then as a workplace. Plus to meet some of the other high school interns made me realize how far behind I really was. Most notably I want to give a big thank you to Aaron Long who you can find here: http://aalong64.blogspot.com/

I didn't talk much to Aaron Long, I rarely ever saw him initially. When the studio moved locations (luckily within walking distance still) I ended up sharing some space with Aaron. He was on John's blog and at first I didn't take much notice. I was intrigued to say the least, and it wasn't long before I ended up on the blog reading Johns theories and study material. I did talk to Aaron at this time, but even then we didn't communicate much. He was years ahead of me then, and still is now. I was envious to say the least, and this helped motivate me to improve.

Eventually John's blog was something I was reading daily. I didn't quite agree with much of what John had to say in regards to Disney. Who at this point I was absolutely stunned by (not the man himself, just the artists who worked for him) and felt John may have been a bit harsh in his analysis. Although I didn't agree I understood that John wasn't some mere armchair historian (I unfortunately am one of these), he had quite a lot of material to back up his point and to bring theories to light. It was from John I rediscovered Warner Brothers cartoons, most notably Clampett.

Now in regards to Clampett (and Tex Avery should be lumped in here as well) I have seen some of his directed work when I was a kid. I had VHS tapes with various cartoons, and these were worn out by my two older brothers. Some of them were from Clampett, Freleng, Avery, Disney, Fleischer, and more. We also got some Disney feature films as well. These tapes were either too bright, or too dark, or were broken part way through. I always had a blast watching these cartoons, but it wasn't until I was shown Johns blog that I would ever look back at them.

This helped change some of my views and see how far cartoons can push the medium of animation. I still don't agree with everything John says, I still approach what he says with a grain of salt. In regards to theory that is. With drawing principles he is spot on, and it was backed up by what the artists at the studio tried to teach me and vice versa.

Once again I have lost focus on the point I was trying to make. Let me try and sum it up. I obtained new influence while interning at Chuck's studio. While it has benefited me I haven't really been using my "influences" to help create new work, I am merely copying them. Now to finish my rambling.

I still want to pursue animation, and I have much to work on. However, I am finding myself walking the path of a copier not a creator. Maybe it is just me having to build skill from drawing other peoples work. Maybe I need to put those influences (as well as my studies) to work and make it part of my work. All the while expanding my influences, discovering other great artists of old. Building a library of work to look to. So I just expanded what I was ultimately trying to say, and make it look good. Not much of an accomplishment.

TL;DR Personally I don't think I know what I am talking about, I am simply ranting about my inability to utilize studies for my personal work without getting lost. Also expect some sketchbook work to be posted soon enough.

More doodles from the office

Yay! Another post! Guess it is better to post a little more frequently instead of posting dozens of images at once. These were some studies done from WB and MGM cartoons. I drew them from my iPod Touch, and I don't use it enough. Being able to go frame-by-frame and take screen captures works really well. Of course the iPad would be far more suitable for this kind of thing.

I really like the pic of Bugs below. That smile is just full of mischievous joy, and the idea that strikes his mind to torment the poor mutt is too much.

Good Lord, how many times have I drawn and re-drawn this pose! Not enough I guess. It still isn't quite right.

One thing that continues to ring in my mind from my internship is to finish poses. At least, sometimes I do. His right arm is also a little flat, and it lacks flow.

Sketch/Doodle Dump - Office Doodles and Sketchs

Wow, over a year and a half! Time to dust off the blog and post some more!

So I have been drawing at the office I am at (working with the family business) and have resorted to drawing on lined paper with pens. I still use sketchbooks, but drawing on lined paper allows me to make more mistakes (and subsequently learn from them) and treat these pads like real sketchbooks. I don't know why, but I have this phobia of being perfect. As though my sketchbook should be my very best work, even if the drawings are from photos, stills from cartoons or movies! I don't know, doubtful I am the only one who has trouble with this

Anyway, so I wouldn't say I have greatly improved since last. I have improved, if only slightly. My lines are still not that tight (as in they are scribbly), my knowledge still seemingly low, construction is still a bit of a challenge, and I am still stuck in my contour shell. At least that is how I have been viewing it, but that is what it is about. Climbing that hill so you can climb another!

Lets get down to it. There is some order to these drawings (in that they are oldest to newest) and some of them have been folded. Please ignore some of my written comments (and my terrible penmanship) they are just obvious statements that I like to make so I won't forget. I like to critique my own work, on my work.

The next few drawings are based on different athletic body types. You can find the original images here: Athletic Body Types

I found a website with some decent reference material which I used as a "life drawing" session. The website can be found here.

At this point I was just aimlessly doodling, and drawing from Frazetta Paintings/Inkings.

The next three images are just something I did for funs sake.

I would like to post some sketchbook work, but the scanner is far too small to allow this. So this will have to do for the time being. I am looking to practice tones and having multiple figures in a single image. It also gets to be incredibly difficult placing people correctly (with composition and environment in mind) while maintaining proper proportions. As for the Frazetta work, he is just too good. To get the subtle shapes, colour, lines and tone he applies to his work (and applying it to my own) takes more than just self-study. I will most certainly revisit some of these subjects sooner or later.

Moving

So, I'm moving in April. Moving out into the country, getting out of the suburbs. At the very least I'll have my own room for a year or two, rather than sharing one with three others. So, at this point there still won't be any art updates till I get settled. I'm going to keep on practicing though, I'm rusty as it is already.

My only hope, is that my families business won't tie up too much of my time. I barely have time to do much now as it is, so I've got to buckle down and do something.

Anyways, thought I'd relay the old news.